FW: What Do the NIV, Satan, and Gay Sex Have in Common? - THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY =0
|
By Eugene
I stumble upon an article with this statement: “If you are using the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible, and continue to do so after reading this article, then you are truly blinded by Satan, or just don’t care… The NIV is wicked… I beg you not to simply throw your NIV away, lest someone else be cursed by finding it–rip it to shreds, and then throw it away!” The article quoted many verses, comparing the KJV and NIV text and exposing errors, omission and so called blasphemies of the Word of God. It also informs the readers about Zondervan the publisher who publish The NIV Bible are also the publisher of the Satanic Bible and a certain book for homosexuals. With NIV being the most read translation around the world, this is really a controversy. But actually I’m not really bother by this truth for myself because from the beginning I am using the NLT, NASB and KJV in my studies. As for me, I will not suggest to anyone what Bible Translations to read or not read. What I want to encourage everybody is not to stick at one translation only, to read diverse translation for further insights. I am not supporting that the KJV is the only reliable translation but it is good to return to it because it contains the original words from the Greek. I use KJV in my word studies and it is very rewarding for me because it yields more insights. Paraphrase like NLT and Amplified will also help a lot in our study of the Bible. Another thing, I find this article on a website which fights many false doctrines, satanisms, and occultism. I believe that it is not good for us Christians to be exposed on all those false teachings and doctrines. The best way to counter them is for us to expose our self with the truth. Study the truth of Scriptures and we will never be deceived by all these false teachings. When we are fully aware of what God says we will recognize error when we meet them. “This will continue until we all come to such unity in our faith and knowledge of God’s Son that we will be mature in the Lord, measuring up to the full and complete standard of Christ. Then we will no longer be immature like children. We won’t be tossed and blown about by every wind of new teaching. We will not be influenced when people try to trick us with lies so clever they sound like the truth.” (Ephesians 4:13-14) |
Tags: christianster, of the story, the other side
April 1st, 2009 at 10:30 am
posted by tigger2008 on 04/01/09 08:10 AM
Why isn’t the word “sodomite” in the NIV?
The answer is because there were homosexuals (what the Bible terms “Sodomites” after the city of Sodom which God destroyed because of it’s woeful wickedness) on the NIV translating committee. One such sodomite was Virginia Mollenkott. Another sodomite was the Chairman of the NIV Old Testament Committee! The name of the sodomite? Dr. Marten H. Woudstra (he’s dead now). The following quote was ascribed to Dr. Woudstra, Chairman of the NIV Old Testament Committee:
“There is nothing in the Old Testament that corresponds to homosexuality as we understand it today”
Is it any wonder why the word “sodomite” is not in the NIV? It doesn’t require too much thinking. Look below and see what they replaced the word “sodomite” with:
________________________________________
THE AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION
Deuteronomy 23:17- There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.
THE NIV
Deuteronomy 23:17- No Israelite man or woman is to become a shrine prostitute.
________________________________________
THE AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION
1 Kings 14:24- And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.
THE NIV
1 Kings 14:24- There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land; the people engaged in all the detestable practices of the nations the LORD had driven out before the Israelites.
________________________________________
THE AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION
1 Kings 15:12- And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made.
THE NIV
1 Kings 15:12- He expelled the male shrine prostitutes from the land and got rid of all the idols his fathers had made.
________________________________________
THE AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION
1 Kings 22:46- And the remnant of the sodomites, which remained in the days of his father Asa, he took out of the land.
THE NIV
1 Kings 22:46- He rid the land of the rest of the male shrine prostitutes who remained there even after the reign of his father Asa.
________________________________________
THE AUTHORIZED KING JAMES VERSION
2 Kings 23:7- And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove.
THE NIV
2 Kings 23:7- He also tore down the quarters of the male shrine prostitutes, which were in the temple of the LORD and where women did weaving for Asherah.
Why is this important? A couple of reasons.
1. Ever heard of “Sodomy Laws”? It was illegal in the U.S. to be a sodomite (now people call ‘em homosexuals); hence SODOMY laws. In a generation or two, people, including Christians who read the NIV, won’t know where the word sodomite came from.
2. This change from sodomite to “shrine prostitute” tells us that homosexuality isn’t bad, there are just some homosexuals doing bad things. This sentiment has been expressed by a number of pro-sodomite individuals who claim Christ. They are deceiving themselves for the scripture says the effeminate and abusers of themselves with mankind won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven.
This NIV revelation makes me want to use the word “sodomite” all the time! I plan to use it in place of the nicer sounding “homosexual”. The sodomites were criminals that were destroyed by God for their wicked practices. Men with men working that which is unseemly–receiving in themselves the recompence of their error which was meet. Read more about sodomites Mollenkott and Woudstra here.
Mmmm, interesting stuff here on the sodomites. Yet some professing Christian will write me quoting NIV scholars and complaining that the KJV is full of errors! We know what happens when the blind lead the blind–both shall fall into the ditch!
________________________________________
April 1st, 2009 at 10:31 am
posted by tigger2008 on 04/01/09 08:40 AM
Which Bible verses did the NIV delete?
The New International Version deletes over 64,000 words including words like: Godhead, regeneration, mercyseat, Calvary, remission, Jehovah, immutable, omnipotent, Comforter, Holy Ghost, Messiah, quickened, infallible, et cetera. Most of the modern Bibles line up very closely with the NIV–and so does the New World Translation–the Bible of the Jehovah’s Witnesses cult!
When you read below where I say that a verse is COMPLETELY deleted, I mean clean/bald-headed/gone/vanished deleted. For instance, if you search for Acts 8:37 in the NIV you will read,
36As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, “Look, here is water. Why shouldn’t I be baptized?”
38And he ordered the chariot to stop. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him.
Verse 37 is CLEAN, BALD-HEADED, GONE, VANISHED, MY FRIENDS (and it is a powerful verse)! Some foolish people have written me saying, “But it says something in the footnotes.” I have three responses.
(1) When you are reading your Bible do you look at the footnotes after every verse? Do you say “I am reading verse 3 so let me look below and see if something in verse 3 is missing.”? Even if you did do that (which you don’t) the footnotes say that the “best manuscripts” don’t have the verse–will you then agree with them that the verse doesn’t belong? If not, then why are you reading an NIV?
(2) Not all the word deletions are found in the footnotes of the NIV so don’t think for a second that they are letting you know all the changes they made.
(3) The next logical step will be for the NIV to omit the footnotes and just reorder everything. In the example above verse 38 would become verse 37 so it wouldn’t look funny. Look at the J.B. Phillips translation–that heretick didn’t number the individual verses so you don’t know what you’re missing. It’s paragraph style. The NIV may go that way too. They are desensitizing you to the changing of the very words of God. In summary, they’ll either renumber or go to that paragraph format.
Wait a minute, hold the presses! I got the following from Bill W. one of our dear readers:
“I was in the Christian Book store today. I saw some thing that shocked me. I look through the Bibles often. I looked at the CHILDREN’S NIV. I looked up the missing verses and there was something I could not believe. I looked up Matt 17:21 and of course it is missing BUT in this Children’s Bible it was typed out like this 20/21 and the 21st verse was still missing. They make you think that you read the 21st verse but it still is just the 20th verse! Can you believe it???!!! If you want to look for yourself find the CHILDREN’S NIrV BIBLE, and see for yourself. I did look in the other NIV’s to see if they did the same thing. They DID NOT do that, BUT how long before they do?????!”
They are already sneaking the deletions into the children’s Bibles! This is the second time that I’ve heard of those foxes pulling one over on little helpless children. The other thing I’ve seen them do is retranslate the kids’ and prisoners’ Bibles to make them gender neutral. Of course those foxes didn’t market them that way, they just snuck in the gender inclusivity. See this article for details.
Another update! I just opened the JW “Bible”, the New World Translation (1961 ed.), and looked up all the verses that the NIV completely deletes. THE JEHOVAH’S WITNESS BIBLE DELETES THE EXACT SAME ONES!!!! I mean ALL of ‘em! The only difference between the NIV and the New World Translation deletions is that the JW Bible does not include any footnotes! Isn’t that what I said above, that the NIV would eventually delete the footnotes? To learn more about the Jehovah’s Witnesses and their damnable doctrines go to our article on cults.
Our illiterate, lazy culture has spilled over to many professing Christians who have embraced the ways of the sluggard (and their want shall come upon them as an armed man). They are willing to read a Satanic “Bible” version missing what God says so they can be lazy and not do their due diligence. Your modern Bible perversion was written by men using dynamic equivalence. In other words, they are telling you their interpretation and their doctrine–NOT what the manuscripts really say. Don’t believe me? Look at the article on the NIV using gender inclusive language. Gender inclusivity wasn’t in the “originals”–it is a modern, feminist concept born of REBELLION.
A number of brothers and sisters, after examining the facts, have said, “I’m getting a King James!” Many have shared what a blessing the King James Bible has been to them and their spiritual life. The King James isn’t hard. I’ve seen one and two year olds quoting it and I am not exaggerating. I’ve taught it to people who cannot read and to children whose second language is English. I actually find the modern Bibles more difficult to read than the King James.
If you read a modern Bible, don’t let your pride get in the way of really looking at this information. Some people get hostile because I’m sharing these facts. Look up the verses and see that what you call the Bible is not the Bible. Get a real Bible. The King James conformable to the edition of 1611–NOT the New King James or the KJ21, etc. they are not King James Bibles.
WHOLE Bible verses deleted in the NIV
The following WHOLE verses have been removed in the NIV–whether in the text or footnotes…over 40 IN ALL!!!
Matthew 12:47 — removed in the footnotes
Matthew 17:21 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.”
Matthew 18:11 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.”
Matthew 21:44 — removed in the footnotes
Matthew 23:14 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.”
Mark 7:16 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.”
Mark 9:44 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.”
Mark 9:46 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.”
Mark 11:26 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.”
Mark 15:28 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors.”
Mark 16:9-20 (all 12 verses) — There is a line separating the last 12 verses of Mark from the main text. Right under the line it says: [The two most reliable early manuscripts do not have Mark 16:9-20] (NIV, 1978 ed.) The Jehovah’s Witness “Bible” also places the last 12 verses of Mark as an appendix of sorts.
Luke 17:36 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”
Luke 22:44 — removed in the footnotes
Luke 22:43 — removed in the footnotes
Luke 23:17 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“(For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.)”
John 5:4 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.”
John 7:53-8:11 — removed in the footnotes
Acts 8:37 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. It’s deletion makes one think that people can be baptized and saved without believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. Sounds Catholic. What are you NIV readers missing?
“And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”
Acts 15:34 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still.”
Acts 24:7 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,”
Acts 28:29 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves.”
Romans 16:24 — COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.”
I John 5:7 — Vitally important phrase COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. In the NIV it says,
“For there are three that testify:”
Compare the NIV reading with the following Jehovah’s Witness reading–
“For there are three witness bearers,”
What are you NIV readers missing? What does the real Bible say?
“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”
This is one of the GREATEST verses testifying of the Godhead. That is why the Jehovah’s Witnesses leave it out. They do not believe in the Godhead and they do not believe that Jesus is God. Why does the NIV leave it out…? Whole books have been written on the manuscript evidence that supports inclusion of this verse in the Bible. Reader, do you believe in the Godhead? If so, then this deletion should offend you.
April 5th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
I remember that the Devil used verses from the Old Testament in tempting Jesus and in making Him believe that what he intends to say comes from the Father. But Jesus was not deceived for He knew that the contents of the Bible can be used as weapon to deceive the faithful.
What we should learn from the Devil’s temptation to our Lord is the fact that the Devil will use the Bible just to deceive us. the NIV, Feminist bibles, sport bibles, and multitude of bibles is being used by the enemy to trick us into a belief that we are indeed reading His words and blindly lead us to faithlessness.
A believer should not be blind. A soldier of God must always be vigilant, for our enemy is ancient. It has thousand of years to study and read the Bible and plan to use it for his evil deeds. What we need is guidance and the wisdom from our Lord. This because no matter how ancient he is, his wisdom when it come to the Word is nil, simply because he do not want to accept the grace of the Holy Spirit, the one who gives wisdom. This also precisely the reason why he was wrong in believing that the death of Jesus is his victory. He misread the old testament prophets, he misread the scriptures.
April 29th, 2009 at 4:09 am
Very nice post.